ISO 27001 Certification : Gap Analysis vs. Risk Assessment

ISO 27001 Certification, ISO 27001 Certification in  Bangalore

Gap analysis and hazard assessments are two of the most imperative procedures associations must total while actualizing ISO 27001 Certification or looking into their consistence status.
There are a great deal of similitudes between the two, which frequently makes associations befuddle them and use components of one procedure in the other. This prompts superfluous work and consumption, and in certain examples can result in the association neglecting to meet ISO 27001's requirement.
To ensure this doesn't transpire, we've given a brisk guide clarifying how each procedure functions and how they fit together.

What is a risk assessment?

An ISO 27001 Certification gap analysis gives associations a review of what they have to do to fulfill the Guideline's prerequisites. It includes experiencing every condition of ISO 27001 Certification and deciding if the association has actualized the essential necessities.
This could be a straightforward tick-box work out, with the unchecked necessities framing the holes that may should be tended to (not all provisions should be executed). On the other hand, you could adopt an increasingly mind boggling strategy, deciding if:

·         There is no arrangement to execute the necessity;
·         There is an arrangement yet the prerequisite hasn't been executed;
·         The necessity has been halfway actualized;
·         The necessity has been executed yet hasn't been evaluated; or
·         The necessity has been executed and is consistently evaluated.

gap analysis possibly should be performed when building up your Statement of Applicability, which implies that you don't have to dissect the provisions contained in the primary piece of the Standard, just those in Annex A.

What is a risk assessment?

Risk assessments give associations a thought of the dangers confronting them, how likely it is that every one of those situations will happen and how serious the harm will be.
The procedure starts by making a considerable rundown of dangers, which will be given a risk score. This is determined by allotting a number to changing degrees of likelihood and harm, subsequently empowering the association to organize its greatest dangers and which of ISO 27001 Certification controls it should actualize.

In the event that there are no dangers that would legitimize the utilization of a specific control, there is no compelling reason to actualize it. On the other hand, if a control keeps an exceptionally harming or likely hazard, the association ought to devote extra time and assets to it.

What’s the difference between the two?

A gap analysis indicates associations which of ISO 27001 Certification controls they have actualized, and now and again gives extra data about their advancement in fulfilling the Guideline's necessities.
In any case, it doesn't enable associations to comprehend whether each control is important. That is the thing that a hazard appraisal is for. The two procedures accordingly structure two pieces of an entirety.

Free Risk Assessment and ISO 27001 Certification green paper

The risk assessment process is regularly troublesome, complex to oversee and needs outside help.
·         Common issues to abstain from encompassing the hazard appraisal process;
·         How to create dependable and powerful outcomes in five clear stages; and
·         How to utilize hazard appraisals to accomplish greatest advantages from least security costs.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT IS INFORMATION CLASSIFICATION & HOW IS IT RELEVANT TO ISO 27001 CERTIFICATION?

ISO 27001 Certification : is Your Certification validate?

The Importance of an ISO 27001 Certification Internal Auditor

Quality Assurance from Production to the Consumers with the ISO 22000 Certification